Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Tannenbaum's Claims



     In discussions of slavery, one controversial issue has been the divergence of morality between America and countries such as Brazil, Spain and Portugal. The Northwestern and Southwestern hemispheres consisted of opposing views on the slave system. Tannenbaum’s argument that conditions were different in these areas and that America was harsher is supported by his lengthy research. We can see evidence to support his claim when he discusses the various opportunities Negros had in Brazil. In colonial Brazil it was socially acceptable for attractive women of color to be romantically involved with white men and even own slaves themselves. African Americans were given the opportunity to pursue significant endeavors like attaining a political role or becoming a doctor.

From Tannenbaum’s perspective the main reason for this split in ideologies is a matter of morality. One the one hand we have the Latin who reap the benefits of slavery while also offering slaves opportunities to participate in society. On the other hand however, we have Americans who considered this approach unheard of because they did not consider Negros human beings. A prime example of these ethical issues is their opposing views on manumission and how they went out of their way to either support or prevent it.

No comments:

Post a Comment